Downtown Mt. Vernon and Lisbon

 

1st Street NW, Mt. Vernon: Downtown with homey feel

Two small towns in eastern Linn County, Mt. Vernon and Lisbon, have retained pleasant traditional downtowns with historic buildings and nearby residential areas. The towns are growing in population, unlike most small midwestern towns, probably because they're within commuting distance of Cedar Rapids and Iowa City. Note that Mt. Vernon has grown more (nearly all in the first decade of the 21st century), and is younger and more middle class than Lisbon.

	POP 2000	POP 2020	% INCREASE	% BACH DEG	MED AGE
Cedar Rapids	120,563	137,710	14.2	35	36.4
Lisbon	1,922	2,233	16.2	27	40
Mt Vernon	3,394	4,527	33.4	49	28.2
IOWA	2,926,324	3,190,369	9	32	38.6
USA	281,421,906	331,449,281	17.8	36	38.8

(data from U.S. Census Bureau)

Cornell College in Mt. Vernon brings in some outside money and youthful energy. The campus begins at 5th Avenue SW, and includes the public library. Cornell's enrollment has grown about 7 percent since 2017-18, defying national trends, from 1009 in '17-'18 to 1074 in '22-'23 ("Cornell College Institutional Profile").

101-103 1st St NE, Mt. Vernon (built 1894)

Fuel Art and Espresso is a friendly coffee house, surprisingly full at mid-morning, with a fair number of groups and a lot of interaction between customers. Another coffee house, Little Scratch, is two doors down at 113. There are a variety of bars and restaurants as well. The Lincoln Wine Bar is among the tonier:

125 1st St NW, Mt. Vernon (built 1893)

Their wood-fired pizza is worth the trip over from Cedar Rapids.

Downtown Mt. Vernon abuts the college and several residential neighborhoods. Two blocks from 1st Street, I found this creative reminder to drivers to keep their eyes out for children coming down the hill on 3rd Avenue. "Pres Hill" is left unplowed after snowfalls for use by sledders.

3rd Avenue and 3rd Street NW, Mt Vernon

I rode my bike over to Lisbon. I live in hope for the interurban trail, but for now 1st Street to Lisbon Road (Main Street in Lisbon) is workable. It follows the route of the original Lincoln Highway. There's a wide sidewalk for an alternative to the street.

I didn't get as good a look at downtown Lisbon because Main Street was closed for Sauerkraut Days!

Gearing up for Sauerkraut Days:
South Washington Street approaching Main

Downtown Lisbon is two blocks' worth of Main Street, with one restaurant, a couple of bars, and (gasp!) no coffee. There's also the public library and an arts space. (Parallel to Main is the perplexingly-named Market Street, which has no businesses on it.) You see the same mix of older and compatible buildings as in Mt. Vernon... 

Downtown living: Lisbon Apts, 145 E Main St (1899)

...and a lot of the houses have capacious front porches.

There are several vacant buildings in the downtown area.

Vacant restaurant, 125 E Main St, Lisbon (1877)

When I returned after Sauerkraut Days, I estimated at least a third, and possibly as many as half of downtown buildings are vacant, though the existing stores are very up-to-date.

Gwen's, at 119 W Main St, was a Lisbon institution in an 1894 building mentioned in a Dan Bern/Dan Colehour song, but it has closed

 A recent city survey found 76 percent of Lisbon respondents favoring a "more prominent Main Street with more commercial opportunities" (City of Lisbon Comprehensive Plan 2021-2041, p. 7). This will be even more of a challenge if the center of the town's gravity shifts towards the highway bypass.

Lincoln Square Park, at the corner of Main and Walnut Streets, commemorates the Lincoln Highway and has a nice picnic shelter

Back in Mt. Vernon, just over the boundary line is a short north-south ped/bike trail...

Just off 3rd Street NE

...that goes by the skate park.

Under Hill Skate Park, 331 B Ave NE, Mt Vernon

This gives a safe alternative to the street for the boys who were just leaving the park when I arrived, and could eventually connect up to the planned Interurban Trail to Cedar Rapids.

Lisbon Future Land Use Map
(City of Lisbon Comprehensive Plan 2021-2041, p. 11)

Development along the recently-constructed US 30 bypass is likely to bring in some new property tax revenue to both Mt. Vernon and Lisbon, although that's not a long term winner (see Strong Towns on "The Growth Ponzi Scheme") and may ultimately draw resources away from the town cores and/or the residential neighborhoods. That's for the towns to figure out, for at present they have downtowns worth keeping.

Abbe Creek School Museum, just west of Mount Vernon

P.S. With traffic having been rerouted twice from the original Lincoln Highway, you don't have to get far out of town before you get a real country road feeling. I drank my coffee on the grounds of this one-room schoolhouse built in 1844, kicked off my sandals to walk in the wet grass, and then walked barefoot across the highway to this cemetery, where about half of the occupants seem to be Keplers.

Abbe Creek Cemetery

Project 2025 and Our Common Life

Heritage Foundation, Washington DC,
on a cloudy day in 2012

The first thing you notice about Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's massive policy book for the next Republican administration, is not its content but its tone. Considering it's ostensibly about public policy, it has a lot about who it targets rather than how it proposes to solve public problems. The foreword, by Foundation president Kevin D. Roberts, is barely underway before it throws blame for today's problems on "wholesale dishonesty and corruption" of "the ruling and cultural elite today" (p. 1). Nothing happens unless it's someone's fault?

Contemporary elites have even repurposed the worst ingredients of 1970s "radical chic" to build the totalitarian cult known today as "The Great Awokening."... Most alarming of all, the very moral foundations of our society are in peril. (1)

Fevered, ad hominem attacks and name-calling continue throughout the foreword. 

In many ways, the entire point of centralizing political power is to subvert the family. Its purpose is to replace people’s natural loves and loyalties with unnatural ones (2).... The noxious tenets of “critical race theory” and “gender ideology” should be excised from curricula in every public school in the country. These theories poison our children (5)... Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists (8)....

...and on and on. References to the "global abortion industry" (261) in a chapter on foreign aid, and "the grotesque culture of violence against the child in the womb" (642) in a chapter on veterans, aren't going to gain you allies for the policies you advocate, either. 

Given the Heritage Foundation's own massive endowment and presence, one could be forgiven for thinking that they themselves are part of the ruling elite. Perhaps "ruling elite" is defined here as "smart people who disagree with us." 

Beyond the fantastic quality to this screed that seems remote from anyone's actual life, I think the tone detracts from the substance they are trying to promote here. Joe Biden comes in for a lot of criticism, as does Barack Obama, while Donald Trump gets none until page 722 relating to the Export-Import Bank. (Anyone who does appear to criticize Trump, like U.S. international broadcasts discussed in chapter 8, get roundly flayed.) I realize I'm not the target audience for Project 2025, but if I were to pick up a paper on, say, climate change, and it began with a lot of attacks on Donald Trump or Mitch McConnell or capitalism, it would lead me to question the credibility of the policy thinking that accompanied them. Are we even trying to solve public problems here, or are we just trying to elect Republicans and shout down people we don't like?

This is a problem because, whenever Project 2025 stops screaming about elites, it discusses some rather serious problems our society faces, like challenges to the family, from China, and for government budgeting, as well as the loss of separation of powers in the government. I feel I'd like to talk with these (mostly) guys, about these problems individually, or better yet as common symptoms of some deeper dysfunctionality, but the authors in Project 2025 prefer to reverse engineer their approach based on crushing their enemies. In reality, our American/human destiny is a common one, and we need to hear from all perspectives. Conservatives certainly have important perspectives, but there needs to be more engagement and less of what Daniel Pink (2024) called "authoritarian revenge porn."

The 30 chapters that follow contain some valuable practical advice. Chapters 1 and 2, by Rick Dearborn and Russ Vought, respectively, provide a basic introduction to the Executive Branch of which any citizen should be aware, and certainly anyone undertaking to work therein, whether or not their principal motivation is "combating the Left’s aggressive attacks on life and religious liberty, and confronting 'wokeism' throughout the federal government" (38). Chapter 7, by Dustin J. Carmack, gets 17 paragraphs into a careful analysis of the challenges facing intelligence in the post-9/11 world (201-204) before he suddenly seems to realize he hasn't attacked "woke culture" yet. There are interesting exchanges on trade in chapters 23 and 26.

I certainly don't have the policy expertise to evaluate the many recommendations in Project 2025. Nor do I have the resources to evaluate the truth or falsity of its numerous claims. (For responses to chapters 11 on education, and 8 and 28 on communications technology, see Perera, Valant and Meyer (2024) and Muenster (2024), respectively.) Project 2025 contains a lot of inside baseball, or #iykyk, nearly all of which goes over my head. A seemingly obvious proclamation like "To fulfill its mission, USAGM should also aim to present the truth about America and American policy— not parrot America’s adversaries’ propaganda and talking points" (235) is certainly a red flag that the writer is grinding some axe or other. I will say it is sobering to read how much investment there needs to be in the military (ch. 4) so quickly after condemnation of the national debt (chs 1-3) while we are also expecting to cut taxes (ch. 22). 

From the perspective of our common life, which is what we're all about here on Holy Mountain, there are reasons to worry if Project 2025 becomes the blueprint for the next administration its contributors clearly hope it will be.

1. Public problems that are inconvenient to the ideology of Project 2025--like climate change, access to health care, the legacy of racism, agricultural chemical runoff causing a dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, gun violence, pedestrian deaths, threats against local officials, exploitation of workers, and inequality of wealth and opportunity--are either ignored or dismissed as unbelievable. Climate change doesn't appear until chapter 9 on foreign aid, when the very idea is described as "radical" and "extreme" (257). One page later the text attacks gay rights as "bullying" and "partisan" (258) while alleging "Past Democratic administrations have nearly erased what females are and what femininity is" (258-259). Chapter 5, on homeland security, doesn't even bother with an analysis of immigration problems; it wants control centralized so the border with Mexico can be "secured." (For some ways this approach to border security might implicate current residents, see Krauze 2024.) The Department of Homeland Security "has also suffered from the Left’s wokeness and weaponization against Americans whom the Left perceives as its political opponents" (135). We're outraged by phantoms and other points of view while we ignore the most serious public problems.

2. freedom. This is a value popular among the contributors to Project 2025, as well it should be, though perhaps it is not as popular with them as "interests" or "values." Freedom is actually objective #1 under education policy (322). Freedom has a lot of meanings in political theory. Here it seems to mean exemption from liberal policies one doesn't agree with, and the right not to be exposed to ideas not your own. Either we get our way, or we take our ball and go home. Section III features attacks on "the irrational, destructive, un-American mask and vaccine mandates that were imposed upon an ostensibly free people during the COVID-19 pandemic" (283). That includes having churches closed on Easter 2020: "What is the proper balance of lives saved versus souls saved?" (456). Chapter 8 on quotes Thomas Jefferson (on government funding for churches) to justify its scorched earth approach to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (246). Conservatives--apparently including ex-President Trump and the January 6 rioters (285 and pretty much all of chapter 17)--should have autonomy from anything from which they disagree, but not so liberals who go in for "woke transgender activism" or "abortion as a form of 'health care'" (284, scare-quotes in original). We get the right-to-infect and freedom to discriminate against transgendered people, but not to be safe during a pandemic or to be transgendered people.

3. separation of powers. Vought cites James Madison on separation of powers, urging the President to be bold in clawing back discretionary authority from the bureaucracy (filled with elitists who are often woke!), while restrained in relations with Congress with which they share power. This would be a tricky balancing act under any circumstances, given the long-standing incentives for Congress to delegate power to the executive as well as the inability of the elected and appointed leaders to oversee the vast bureaucracy. Vought is heavy on coordination and direction, and light on restraint. Chapter 5 wants centralized control over immigration; chapter 6 wants centralized control over foreign policy. It is easy to read this, as many have, as empowering the President to do conservative things by overriding checks and balances within the federal government, with self-restraint reserved for inconvenient things like racism and climate change (p. 60).

4. love. This may be a weird criterion to judge a policy book, but the mountain on this blog is a holy mountain, after all. So much of this text is full of animosity. Even chapter 3 on the bureaucracy, analytically written by Donald H. Devine and co-authors, portrays federal employees not as human beings but as overpaid statistics. (How dare they have union representation and a pension plan! We like our workers hungry and scared?) Opponents are enemies, their motives portrayed with cynicism. (Chapter 4 on the military makes several mysterious references to "Marxist indoctrination" and the authors are obsessed with pandemic-era requirements for masks and vaccinations. Chapter 5 refers to the COVID-19 "vaccine" (scare-quotes in original, p. 156).) None of the contributors cites the biblical book of Revelation to advocate political opponents be thrown into a lake of fire, but the same logic prevails that other points of view must not be tolerated. Really? If you love this country, that means loving the people who live in it, including those with other perspectives than your own. Don't hate them, learn from them.

5. sinfulness. Maybe this is an even weirder criterion? If we take seriously that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23), we should proceed cautiously with policy change, especially if we're as angry as the Project 2025 contributors seem to be. One of the reasons I like Strong Towns so much is that founder Charles Marohn refers constantly to "humility" in their approach. Admittedly, the very comprehensiveness of Project 2025 may exaggerate the degree of instantaneous wholesale change being contemplated. Nevertheless, the ready-to-go-on-day-one war of good against evil that it is itching to declare assumes all of the sin is by Them, and that We stand at Armageddon and battle for the Lord. This degree of presumption is frightening when you think about it, considering there are real human lives at stake.

Project 2025 has had a bumpy ride in 2024. Public opinion polls show that people who have heard of it by and large disapprove of it (Yang 2024). Former President Trump, the putative beneficiary of its thinking, has noted its unpopularity and thus renounced it (Hawkinson 2024). Vice President Harris, now the Democratic candidate, has been trying to frighten people with it, invoking it even when it doesn't actually contain the content she attributes to it (Dale 2024).

The megalith that is Project 2025: Mandate for Leadership is worth taking seriously; in the absence of alternative ideas in the Republican Party, this is the closest thing we have to a Trump campaign platform. It is full of serious ideas, though with a rich mix of partisanship, grievance, and score-settling. If the next Republican administration, possibly as soon as five months from now, pushes angrily "onward!" while denying the existence of key problems, it is likely to be alarming for advocates of common life.

SOURCE: Paul Dans and Steven Groves (eds), 2025 Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (Heritage Foundation, 2023)

SEE ALSO: "Religious Freedom for Whom?" 15 December 2020

Amber Phillips, "What is Project 2025," Washington Post, 30 June 2024

Will Sommer, "He Found a Project 2025 Duffel Bag. Then the Police Showed Up at His House," Washington Post, 16 August 2024

10th anniversary post: What is a complete street?

Edgewood Road SW near the new library is not a complete street, 
but a 10-foot side "trail" and daytime bus service help

Ten years ago, I explored the concept of complete streets, with profiles of three eastside streets "currently suited only to those physically fit and bold of spirit" that I thought could use a bit of complete streets treatment. In the years since, Cedar Rapids has added numerous sidewalks around town, as well as bike lanes and trails, converted most one-way streets back to two-way, and made important zoning reforms. On the other hand, we're turning Mt. Vernon Road into a highway, reserving important land adjacent to downtown for unproductive uses, and everywhere doubling down on car-dependence.

Later in 2014, the city adopted both a Complete Streets Policy and a comprehensive plan, Envision CR, which included complete streets. Envision CR, revised in 2023, defines complete streets as "streets that serve a variety of functions and potentials" (p. 127), with features like separated bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, street furniture, and better drainage, all supported by "special" lighting graphics and landscaping. It identified as ongoing tasks "sign and mark streets for bicyclists" and "retrofit high priority corridors with sidewalks and pedestrian amenities" consistent with the city's Complete Streets Policy (p. 128).

The three incomplete streets I pulled off the top of my head in 2014 have since seen varying impacts of complete streets ideas.

(1) A Avenue NE (small impact).

Turn right to enter I-380: 800 block of A Avenue NE
(Google Earth screenshot, 2021)

Back in the day this was a residential/commercial street. According to the 1953 Polk's Directory, more than 300 people then lived along A Avenue between Coe College and 1st Street downtown. There were also numerous commercial establishments, including a grocery store at 717, a barber shop (708), a bar (800), a restaurant (713), a vet (801), and two cleaners (719 & 835). Imagine the activity on that street at any time of the day seventy years ago, and ponder what has been lost to the interstate highway and medical district expansion.

Today A Avenue's principal purpose now is to provide auto access to St. Luke's Hospital, I-380 entrance at 8th Street, and Quaker Oats. Its four lanes carry 5000 cars a day below 7th Street. In 2021 there was no count above 7th Street, but in 2017 the count was 7600 at the entrance to the interstate, then back down to 5800 in front of St. Luke's Hospital.

Aerial view of the same area
(Google Earth screenshot, 2021)

I'd chosen A to examine, because it's the one of the few available connections between the Mound View neighborhood (including Coe College) and downtown; really the only alternative is high-traffic 1st Avenue. In 2014 I was torn between narrowing A and shifting through car traffic onto 1st, or doing the opposite. Nothing as radical as either of those has been attempted, but there have been two small improvements: the intersection at 10th has been changed from traffic signals to a three-way stop, and brick crosswalks have been added across 12th a.k.a. Coe Road. 

newish crosswalks, A Ave and Coe Road NE
(St. Luke's Hospital in background)

Back then, I said biking was "do-able, but scary, particularly near the interstate," and that walking was complicated at every intersection. That is still true.

I'm probably more in favor now than I was then of closing the interstate altogether. A Avenue shows the damage to urban form brought by an intracity highway and an auto-oriented medical district, and how difficult it is to repair that once done.

(2) 10th Street E (moderate impact).

300 block of 10th Street, heading towards Mercy Hospital
(Google Earth screenshot from 2021)
(Note the gentleman on the sidewalk, unimpressed by the bike lane)

This should be called the Medical Mile, as its nine blocks are bookended by St. Luke's and Mercy Hospitals. Numerous medical offices are located along the way, as well as a lovely historic Firestone Tire establishment...

Firestone Complete Auto Care, 205 10th St SE

..., two churches, and McKinley Middle School (slated for closure, I'm not sure how soon).

Ten years ago, 10th Street was four lanes wide; in 2020 it got a road diet, and is now three lanes with bike lanes on each side. Average daily traffic counts (2021) peak at 10,700 at 3rd Avenue, about 10 percent higher than in 2017.

400 block of 10th Street SE: bike lanes are nice,
but the trees could use a bit of trimming

I'd chosen 10th Street because along most of its length it forms the border between the MedQuarter and the Wellington Heights neighborhood. So, how easily it is crossed is at least as important as how easily it can be traveled by non-car modes. Narrowing the car portion of the street helps, as do the crossing treatments at 3rd Avenue, but the traffic lights at 4th and 5th Avenues still seem to take forever. 

Needs some place to walk to: 4th Avenue and 10th Street, 2019

It may be that what can be done to complete 10th Street has been done, and we now need to look at what's around it. Physicians Clinic of Iowa (202 10th) and Mercy Hospital (701 10th) are massive campuses that are hard to get around/through, and the same may well come to be true of whatever replaces McKinley Middle School (620 10th). The intersection at 8th Avenue, which borders the Oak Hill Jackson neighborhood, is being converted into a roundabout, with the jury out on the pedestrian-friendliness of its design. 

Constructing roundabout at 10th St and 8th Av
(McKinley Middle School in background)

Depending on how the roundabout turns out (ha ha!), a traditional intersection with four-way stops (and no slip lanes) might have been preferable for non-car travelers.

(3) 32nd Street NE (no impact).

There's a sidewalk, but crossing I-380 is rough:
grocery shopping from the Overlook 380 apts
(Google Earth screenshot)

32nd Street is a two-lane, roughly two-mile-long east-west street that runs through the Kenwood neighborhood. It connects 1st Avenue, which is running northeast-southwest at this point, to Center Point Road, which runs north-south. We're getting into suburban traffic patterns at this remove from the core: 29th Street does the same thing in pretty much the same way, but the next closest east-west connection is not until Collins Road. I'd included it on my 2014 list because it's such an artery, passing along the way several apartment buildings, Collins Aerospace, a large Hy-Vee grocery store, the Cedar River Trail, and an entrance to I-380, before it becomes Glass Road and continues on westward. Average daily traffic counts (2021) on 32nd range from 8100 near 1st Avenue to 9300 near the highway; in 2017 the peak was 13,900 near the highway.

In 2014 I complained of high traffic speeds, difficult cycling, and (relayed from Niles Ross) incomplete sidewalks that where they did exist were in poor condition. I imagined, in order to complete the street, "more and smoother sidewalks; calming car traffic with four-way stops at C Av, Eastern Av, and Prairie Dr; sharrow signs, since I don't think the street is wide enough for bike lanes; relaxed zoning in order to allow small commercial development along the street; and a bus line that runs back and forth along 32nd/Glass from 1st to Edgewood." That list has five things on it! which said a lot about the street's needs.

Ten years later, not much has changed on 32nd Street. The sidewalks on the 1st Avenue end are still chopped up, though there are multiple markings suggesting repairs are imminent. 

32nd Street sidewalk, with purposeful markings

Those sidewalks still terminate at F Avenue (north side of the street) and G Avenue (south side of the street. The car traffic still doesn't stop, there are still no bike markings (not even the dreaded sharrow), and bus service is still at the ends of the street rather than along it. I don't remember what commercial development I thought possible back then, but a widely-praised little restaurant, Loosies, has popped up between Oakland and Center Point Roads.

Loosies, 1611 32nd St NE

🌞

As the city presented Envision CR to the public ten years ago, veteran reporter Dale Keuter said he'd seen plenty of plans end up in the "dust heap" (Smith 2014). It's too early to say that's where the complete streets policy is headed. Progress is of necessity going to be gradual, and would-be destinations like the casino, the MedQuarter, and the greenway are always going to get more attention. But as an exceptionally car-dependent city in the 21st century, which has both seen its share of weather disasters and wants to attract young talent, we can't afford to put the day-to-day lives of residents on the back burner.

SEE ALSO: Jane E. Brody, “Keeping Older Pedestrians Safe,” New York Times, 5 January 2015

Spencer Gardner, "Strength Test #6: Can Children Safely Walk or Bike in Your Town?" Strong Towns, 5 April 2017

Sean Hayford Oleary, "If We Want a Shift to Walking, We Need to Prioritize Dignity," Strong Towns, 28 July 2023

ORIGINAL POST: "What is a Complete Street?" 13 August 2014